PIERRE GEDEON A/K/A PETER GIDEON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PIERRE GEDEON A/K/A PETER GIDEON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
846 So. 2d 631
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See State v. Carter, 835 So. 2d 259 (Fla.2002).
STONE, STEVENSON and MAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ignazio Abbate v. State, 82 So. 3d 886 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…g in the record to indicate a waiver of the double jeopardy violation. Instead, the record indicates that prior counsel was ineffective in advising the defendant that convictions for both offenses do not violate double jeopardy. See Keller v. State, 846 So. 2d 631, 633 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (trial court erred in summarily denying defendant’s motion for postconviction relief where defendant claimed that his counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him that his convictions violated double jeopardy). Because…
-
Palmer v. State, 254 So. 3d 426 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
-
COX v. State, 908 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)…potential exposure was for a sentence of 65 years. Because this is a facially sufficient claim which is not conclusively refuted by the attachments to the order under review, the trial court erred in summarily denying the claim. See Keller v. State, 846 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Upshaw v. State, 840 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Weitz v. State, 795 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). See also Brazeail v. State, 821 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). The order under review is accordingly affirmed in part a…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Carter, 835 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 2002)