OCEAN DRIVE ASSOCIATES, LTD., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
DANIEL RUIZ, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2003-05-07
No. 3D02-1502
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FLETCHER, J., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
847 So. 2d 543 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Murphy v. International Robotic Sys., Inc., 766 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 2000); Telemundo Network, Inc. v. Spanish Television Services, Inc., 812 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 831 So. 2d 673 (Fla.2002).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rudolf v. State, 851 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
    …ry intoxication as a defense and for failure to request the voluntary intoxication instruction. At the time the crimes occurred, January 4,1999, voluntary intoxication was a defense to the specific intent crime of grand theft. See Locklear v. State, 847 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Spivey v. State, 680 So. 2d 565 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Ch. 99-174, § 1, at 968, Laws of Fla. (creating section 775.051, Florida Statutes, which abrogates voluntary intoxication as a defense, effective October 1,1999). A review of…
    1 / 2
  • Barboza v. Crosby, 909 So. 2d 928 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
    …al, demonstrates that he had the specific intent to commit these two offenses. Thus, even if Barboza had advanced a voluntary intoxication defense, there is no reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different. See Locklear v. State, 847 So. 2d 543, 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw