J. C. COPPEDGE ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
STATE EX REL. R. FLEMING BOWDEN, TAX COLLECTOR, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a mandamus order requiring the County Board of Public Instruction to pay tax collection commissions to the county tax collector for collecting special school district taxes. The court rejected the defense that the authorizing statute was unconstitutional, holding that the constitutional provision for exclusive use of school funds does not prohibit payment of reasonable statutory commissions for collecting school district taxes.
The statute is constitutional. The constitutional provision that school funds be used exclusively for public free schools does not forbid payment of reasonable statutory commissions for collecting taxes levied for school purposes. The expense of collecting special school district taxes is a school district purpose, and commissions for such collection may be paid from the tax collected for the school district.
“If the statute authorizing the commissions to be paid is unconstitutional, the courts will not by mandamus require a compliance with the statute.”
Establishes that courts cannot enforce unconstitutional statutes through mandamus proceedings, requiring valid constitutional authorization for the underlying law.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe County Board of Public Instruction for Duval County refused to pay commissions to the county tax collector for collecting taxes assessed in specia…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Constitutional Law cases and more on FLexlaw
Whitfield, P. J.
This writ of error was taken to a peremptory writ of mandamus ordered by the circuit court requiring the County Board of Public Instruction for Duval County to pay to the county tax collector commissions allowed by the statute for the collection of taxes assessed in and for special tax school districts in the county. The defense in effect is that no valid statute authorizes or requires such payment.
If the statute authorizing the commissions to be paid is unconstitutional, the courts will not by mandamus require a compliance with the statute. State ex rel. v. Barnes, 25 Fla. 75, 5 So. R. 698; State ex rel v. Barnes, 24 Fla. 29, 3 So. R. 433; State ex rel. v. Bloxham, 26 Fla. 407, 7 So. R. 873; State ex rel. v. Dickinson, 44 Fla. 623, 33 So. R. 514; 50 L. R. A. 539; State ex rel v. Board, 81 Fla. 271, 87 So. R. 917; State ex rel. v. Johnson, 71 Fla. 363, 72 So. R. 477; State ex rel v. Spencer, 81 Fla. 211, 87 So. R. 634; State ex rel. v. Watkins, 88 Fla. 392, 102 So. R. 347; Contra, State ex rel. v. Board, 84 Fla. 592, 94 So. R. 681.
The statute provides that: “The tax collector shall be entitled to commissions upon the aggregate, amount of State taxes, general or special, including licenses collected by him and paid into the State treasury, but not on each separately, as follows: On the first four thousand dollars, ten per cent; on the next three thousand dollars, five per cent; on the balance, one and one-half per cent; and he shall be allowed the same rate of commissions for collecting the county tax. The commissions for collecting the State taxes shall be audited and allowed by the Comptroller and paid by the Treasurer upon warrant therefor; and the commissions for collecting the county taxes shall be audited and allowed by the county commissioners; and the commissions for collecting the tax for the special tax school district taxes shall be audited and allowed by the county-board of public instruction, and shall be at the rate of one and one-half per cent on such collections. The commissions for collecting other special taxes shall be allowed by the county commissioners at the rate of one and one-half per cent and paid out of the special taxes so collected. ’ ’ Section 801, Rev. Gen. Statutes 1920, Section 1033, Comp. Gen. Laws 1927.
The words “shall be audited and allowed by are used with reference to the Comptroller and county commissioners as well as the county board of public instruction. In the connection used, to audit and allow mean to audit and pay if legal and correct.
Section 15, Article XII, Constitution, provides that:
‘ ‘ The compensation of all county school officers shall be paid from the school fund of their respective counties, and all other county officers receiving stated sal aries shall be paid from the general funds of their respective counties.”
Section 10, Article XII, Constitution, provides “for the levying and collection of a district school tax, for the exclusive use of public free schools within the district. ’ ’
The organic provision that school funds shall be “for the exclusive use of public free schools” does not forbid the payment from such funds of reasonable slaUitory commissions for collecting taxes levied for school purposes. A county tax collector is a county officer but he does not receive a stated salary. His compensation consists of commissions upon tax collections. The Constitution provides for a county public school system and for taxation for schools distinct from the county government and from taxation for county purposes; but this does not prevent the collection of school taxes by county officers; nor does it prohibit the payment to county officers of reasonable stai%tory fees for collecting district school taxes. The law does not make the expense of collecting district school taxes a county purpose so that the expense of collecting district school taxes may be paid from county funds. The decision in State ex rel. v. Board, 17 Fla. 418, rendered under the Constitution of 1868, is not in point here. See State ex rel. v. Barnes, 24 Fla. 29, 3 So. R. 433.
The law does not make the expense of collecting a special tax school district tax a State purpose. Such expense is a school district purpose and the law contemplates that the commissions allowed by statute for collecting a school district tax shall be paid from the tax collected for the school district.
Statutes may provide that compensation of officers shall be confined to that allowed for collecting one class of taxes, without any allowance for collecting other classes of taxes. Rawls v. Nolan, 98 Fla. 103, 122 So. R. 222. Unlike the tax assessor, the tax collector is by the statute allowed commissions for collecting special tax school district taxes as well as for collecting State taxes and county taxes.
If the claim is a legal and proper one, mandamus is an appropriate remedy. State ex rel. v. McKinnon, 68 Fla. 548, 67 So. R. 77.
Affirmed.
Strum and Buford, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Bd. of Pub. Instruction v. Kennedy, 109 Fla. 153 (Fla. 1933)…84 Fla. 402, 93 So. Rep. 688; Warren v. Board of Public Instruction, 86 Fla. 254, 97 So. Rep. 384; Barrow v. Moffett, 95 Fla. 111, 116 So. Rep. 71; State v. Board of Pub. Inst. Indian River County, 98 Fla. 1152, 125 So. Rep. 357; Coppedge v. State, 99 Fla. 358, 127 So. Rep. 319; Board of Pub. Inst. Lafayette County, v. Union School Furnishing Co., 100 Fla. 326, 129 So. Rep. 824; Board of Pub. Inst. Lafayette County v. American Seating Co., 100 Fla. 616, 130 So. Rep. 42; Board of Pub. Inst. of Pinellas Cou…
-
State v. Chairman, 129 Fla. 588 (Fla. 1937)…y of Board of Administration, W. V. Knott as State Treasurer and County Treasurer ex officio of Washington County, Florida, filed at this Term of the Court. See also State, ex rel., v. Neville, 123 Fla. 745, 167. So. 650, Coppedge, et al., v. State, 99 Fla. 358, 127 So. 319. The above enunciation is sound, although we recognize the rule to be that before any legislative Act can be judicially declared unconstitutional, its repugnance to' the Constitution must be clearly shown and to the exclusion of all re…
Authorities Cited (12 total)
- State v. The Bd. of Equalizers of the State of Fla., 84 Fla. 592 (Fla. 1922)
- State ex rel. Rivers H. Buford v. Spencer, 81 Fla. 211 (Fla. 1921)
- State of Fla. ex rel. J. C. Lunig v. Johnson, 71 Fla. 363 (Fla. 1916)
- The State ex rel. J. Hugh Murphy v. Barnes, 24 Fla. 29 (Fla. 1888)
- State of Fla. ex rel. Rivers H. Buford v. Watkins, 88 Fla. 392 (Fla. 1923)
- Rawls v. State ex rel. Oscar Nolan, 98 Fla. 103 (Fla. 1929)
- State ex rel. A. J. Russell v. Barnes, 25 Fla. 75 (Fla. 1889)
- The State of Fla. ex rel. John Milton, Jr. v. Dickenson, 44 Fla. 623 (Fla. 1902)
- The State of Fla. ex rel. C. L. Mitchell v. Bloxham, 26 Fla. 407 (Fla. 1890)
- State v. The Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, 17 Fla. 418 (Fla. 1880)