ANDREW PENDER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2003-06-25
No. 3D02-2659
Before COPE, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.
847 So. 2d 1141 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Andrew Pender appeals his conviction for purchase or possession with intent to purchase cocaine. We conclude that the trial court’s evidentiary ruling was consistent with section 90.614, Florida Statutes (2002); see also Charles W. Ehrhardt Florida Evidence § 614.1, at 565 (2002), and accordingly affirm the conviction.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rousey v. State, 226 So. 3d 1015 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
    …because of a flat tire and explaining that the violation was a result of his ineptitude or negligence, not “the product of a knowing and willful act” (quoting Stevens v. State, 599 So. 2d 254, 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992))); see also Boatwright v. State, 847 So. 2d 1141, 1142 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (reversing a revocation order based on the defendant’s five-and-a-half-hour delay returning home from church when it was caused by his attendance at additional church activities); Hern v. State, 747 So. 2d 1039, 1039-40 (Fla…
  • Cherry v. State, 855 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
    …PER CURIAM. We reverse the order revoking the defendant’s community control finding that the State failed to meet its burden of showing that the violation was willful and substantial. See Boatwright v. State, 847 So. 2d 1141, 1142 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Thomas v. State, 760 So. 2d 1138, 1139 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Jones v. State, 730 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Reversed.…
  • Jones v. State, 149 So. 3d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
    …ximately twelve required counseling classes not willful and substantial violation); Perez v. State, 884 So. 2d 306, 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (probationer being twenty minutes late for required drug test not substantial violation); Boatwright v. State, 847 So. 2d 1141, 1142 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (returning five and one half hours late from church services because the defendant got “caught up in the religiosity of the church services” and went to the bishop’s home for group counseling was not a willful or substantial…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw