QUINCY BERNARD JONES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2003-06-06
No. 5D03-1288
THOMPSON, C.J. and PLEUS, J., concur.
848 So. 2d 385 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
ORFINGER, J.

ORFINGER, J.

Quincy Bernard Jones seeks review of an order denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In this proceeding, Jones asserts that his sentence exceeds the sentence stated in the plea agreement. We affirm.

This motion is successive. In a prior rule 3.800(a) motion, Jones raised the very same issue that is the subject of this appeal. Based on the supreme court’s recent decision in State v. McBride, No. 02-627, 28 Fla. L. Weekly S401, 848 So. 2d 287, 2003 WL 21088088 (Fla. May 15, 2003), his claim is barred under the collateral estoppel doctrine. Thus, he is precluded from arguing in a successive 3.800 motion the same issue argued in the prior motion.

We caution Jones against filing additional successive and improper motions. Enough is enough. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); see also Thomas v. State, 824 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, C.J. and PLEUS, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Quincy Bernard Jones v. State, 907 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
    …, Case No. 5D02-3967 (dism. 1/2/03) (habeas corpus); Jones v. State, 5D03-597 (denied 3/11/03) (habeas corpus belated); Jones v. State, Case No. 5D03-1286, aff'd, 848 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (3.850); Jones v. State, Case No. 5D03-1288, aff'd, 848 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Jones v. State, 5D03-1518, aff'd, 849 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (3.800); Jones v. State, 5D03-1983 (denied 10/15/03) (belated [*1257] appeal); Jones v. State, Case No. 5D03-3623 (denied 12/18/03) (mandamus).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw