KARL F. FARRULLA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KARL F. FARRULLA, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
848 So. 2d 392
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See § 921.161, Fla. Stat. (2002).
THOMPSON, C.J., PALMER and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McCLOUGH v. State, 74 So. 3d 158 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…atory on the possession conviction. It is clear that in sentencing McClough the trial court exceeded the negotiated cap. However, this issue was not preserved for review as trial court error. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(b); see Ross v. State, 848 So. 2d 392, 392 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). As such, we must consider McClough’s claim that counsel’s inaction amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel on the face of the record. “The general rule is that a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel may not be r…
-
Toshiba Sanders v. State, 201 So. 3d 790 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Dixon v. State, 53 So. 3d 1242 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); Ross v. State, 848 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). CRENSHAW, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.…