LAURA R. MORRISON, APPELLANT,
v.
ESTATE OF DAVID I. SALEM, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2003-04-23
No. 3D02-2155
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN and WELLS, JJ.
848 So. 2d 1164 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant attorney appeals an order denying her petition for payment of additional .legal fees in a probate matter. Based upon the record evidence adduced below, we cannot conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the same. See DiStefano Constr., Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md., 597 So. 2d 248, 250 (Fla.1992) (stating that “the award of attorney’s fees is a matter committed to sound judicial discretion which will not be disturbed on appeal, absent a showing of clear abuse of discretion.”). See also Afrazeh v. Miami Elevator Co. of Am., 769 So. 2d 399, 401 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (same). We therefore affirm.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw