AL-JEROME CARTER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2003-07-09
No. 3D03-654
Before COPE, GERSTEN, and SHEVIN, JJ.
848 So. 2d 1255 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the defendant was adversely affected by the unconstitutional 1995 sentencing guidelines and must be resentenced.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant was convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced under the 1995 sentencing guidelines. The Florida Supreme Court later found these gu…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Al-Jerome Carter (“defendant”) appeals from an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.800. We reverse and remand for resentencing.

The defendant was convicted of second-degree murder for a crime committed in November of 1996. The defendant was sentenced under the 1995 sentencing guidelines, which permitted the judge to impose a life sentence if the total sentencing points exceeded a certain number. Subsequently, the Florida Supreme Court held the 1995 sentencing guidelines unconstitutional for crimes committed from October 1, 1995 to May 24, 1997. See Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla.2000). Where the sentencing guidelines are unconstitutional, the defendant can claim relief under Rule 3.800. See Copeland v. State, 842 So. 2d 1052 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (holding that the defendant must be resentenced where sentencing guidelines have been held unconstitutional).

Heggs requires only the resentencing of those persons who were adversely affected by the application of the 1995 guidelines. A defendant sentenced outside the guidelines is not adversely affected if the reasons invoked for going outside the guidelines would be valid under both the 1994 and 1995 laws. See State v. Lemon, 825 So. 2d 927 (Fla.2002).

Here, there was no provision in the 1994 guidelines that allowed a life sentence to be imposed if a certain point score was exceeded. Therefore, the defendant was adversely affected by the application of the 1995 guidelines, and the case must be remanded for resentencing. On remand, the trial court may impose an upward departure sentence supported by valid written reasons that existed at the time of the original sentencing. See State v. Betancourt, 552 So. 2d 1107 (Fla.1989); Trotter v. State, 774 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw