ALVIN R. SANDERS, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
ANTHONY PALMIERI AND ANITA PALMIERI, ET AL., APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANT

Fla. 5th DCA | 2003-07-11
No. 5D02-1940
PETERSON, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.
849 So. 2d 417 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The final order that is the subject of this appeal is affirmed. The cross-appeal concerning attorneys’ fees, however, is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. While the trial court has entered an order determining entitlement to attorneys’ fees, it has not yet fixed the amount to be awarded. As an award of attorneys’ fees does not become final, and, therefore, appealable until the amount is set by the trial court, the cross-appeal does not invoke this court’s jurisdiction. See Montanez v. Montanez, 697 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

AFFIRMED. CROSS-APPEAL DISMISSED.

PETERSON, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Mills v. Martinez, 909 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
    …included in the final judgment on damages. At least in regard to attorney’s fees, the order was non-final. An award of attorneys’ fees does not become final, and, therefore, appealable until the amount is set by the trial court. Sanders v. Palmieri, 849 So. 2d 417, 417 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (citing Montanez v. Montanez, 697 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)). It is well settled that a judgment attains the degree of finality necessary to support an appeal when it adjudicates the merits of the cause and disposes of…
  • …gligent”). 2. Because this is a civil statute of a penal nature, any ambiguity in the substantive statute must be construed in favor of the defending party and against the Commission. See United Wisconsin Life Ins. Co. v. Office of Ins. Regulation, 849 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), and cases cited therein. 3. We agree with the administrative law judge that the standard of proof in a case seeking fines under chapter 106 is clear and convincing evidence. See Dept. of Banking and Fin. v. Osborne Stern & Co.,…
  • Fla. Organic Aquaculture, LLC v. Advent Env't Sys., LLC, 268 So. 3d 910 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)
    …as to the issue of attorney’s fees. Mills v. Martinez, 909 So. 2d 340, 342 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“An award of attorneys’ fees does not become final, and, therefore, appealable until the amount is set by the trial court.” (citing Sanders v. Palmieri, 849 So. 2d 417, 417 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003))). However, post-judgment orders denying attorney’s fees are final orders, unless it is clear from the order that the trial court did not intend to end its judicial labor. See Fabing v. Eaton, 941 So. 2d 415, 417–18 (Fla. 2d…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw