W. H. HARRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
C. M. EDWARDS, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1930-03-08
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.
99 Fla. 477 Florida Supreme Court (1930) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order and final decree herein, and briefs and argument' of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and t'he Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order and decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order and decree of the circuit court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cassady v. Sholtz, 124 Fla. 718 (Fla. 1936)
    …tachment on certain personal property of the defendant Harris, which the sheriff took into his custody. On February 13, 1929, final decree in favor of plaintiff was entered in that foreclosure suit, which was affirmed on appeal in Harris v. Edwards, 99 Fla. 477, 126 So. 943. On February 2, 1931, the Special Master appointed by the court in the case of Edwards v. Harris, demanded of B. A. Cassady, Sheriff of Lake County, that said Sheriff [*720] surrender and deliver unto .him for the purpose of sale, in a…
    1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw