GEORGE SAINT FLORANT, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the home invasion conviction was subsumed by the burglary with assault conviction and that there was no merit to the discovery error claim.
George Saint Florant appealed his convictions for armed robbery, home-invasion robbery, kidnapping, and burglary with an assault. The State conceded t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
George Saint Florant appeals his convictions for armed robbery, home-invasion robbery, kidnapping, and burglary with an assault. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The State concedes that the home invasion conviction is subsumed within the conviction for burglary with an assault. Weiss v. State, 720 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). We remand for the striking of the home-invasion robbery conviction, and for a new sentencing hearing on a recalculated guidelines scoresheet.
We find no merit to the claim of discovery error under Richardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771 (Fla.1971). Assuming for purposes of this discussion that the error was chargeable to the State, rather than a failure to communicate between defense co-counsel, the error was in any event corrected when the trial court made provision for the defense to take the deposition of the witness whom the defense had not previously been able to depose. This was an entirely appropriate solution, and there was no defense objection to this procedure.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thurman v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 881 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…So. 2d 978, 980 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). See also Rodriguez v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 869 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Guerrero v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 855 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Reynolds v. SV Central Dania Props., Inc., 849 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Ebersol v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 845 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Goldberg v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 842 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Brooks v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 760 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).…
-
Langworthy v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Commc'n Installation & Cisco, 858 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…n for cases when the claimant proves that he or she successfully transmitted a fax within the time provided in the rule. See Mendelsohn v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 851 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Reynolds v. SV Cent. Dania Props., Inc., 849 So. 2d 1181, 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Ebersol v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 845 So. 2d 945, 947 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).1 In Ebersol, the appeals referee summarily dismissed the claimant’s appeal as late because it was docketed after the deadline. Id. at 946-47…
-
Nickolan-Barron v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 859 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…successfully transmitted to the Office of Appeals at the Agency for Workforce Innovation within the applicable time frame, constituted sufficient evidence that appellant timely faxed her notice of appeal. See Reynolds v. SV Cent. Dania Props., Inc., 849 So. 2d 1181, 1182-83 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Espanioly v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 768 So. 2d 1230, 1230 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); cf. Mendelsohn v. [*595] Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 851 So. 2d 208, 209 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Accordingly, we reverse the Un…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Richardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 1971)
- Weiss v. State, 720 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)