EDWARD CLOSUIT, MYRIAM MURPHY, AND ANDALITE INDUSTRIES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
CRANE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A circuit court lacks authority to award attorneys' fees for services rendered in an appellate court absent prior authorization from the appellate court.
Defendants committed discovery violations, leading the circuit court to award attorneys' fees as a sanction. This included fees for responding to a pe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Attorney'S Fees As Sanction cases and more on FLexlaw
NORTHCUTT, Judge.
The circuit court entered a final judgment awarding Crane Environmental attorneys’ fees as a sanction for the discovery violations of the defendants, Edward Closuit, Myriam Murphy, and Andalite Industries.1 The defendants challenge this judgment on four grounds, but we find merit in only one. We reverse the attorneys’ fees awarded for Crane’s counsels’ time spent in responding to a petition for common law certiorari filed in this court. We affirm the judgment in all other respects.
The petition for certiorari sought review of the circuit court’s order striking the defendants’ trade secret objections to Crane’s request for production of documents. Crane’s counsel responded to the petition but did not file a motion for attorneys’ fees with this court. We subsequently denied the defendants’ petition.
The circuit court determined that Crane was entitled to attorneys’ fees as a sanction for the defendants’ numerous discovery violations. Crane’s attorneys requested $36,442 in fees attributable to their time spent in responding to the petition for certiorari. The circuit court was aware that Crane had not sought fees in this court, but it awarded Crane that amount “as a deterrent and as a sanction.” We understand the court’s frustration with the defendants’ behavior. However, absent an authorization from this court, the circuit court had no authority to award attorneys’ fees for services in this court, even as a sanction. Wood v. Steen, 830 So. 2d 965, 966 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
We reverse the portion of the judgment that awards $36,442 for Crane’s counsels’ time spent in responding to the petition for writ of certiorari. Otherwise, we affirm.
STRINGER and CANADY, JJ., concur. . We have jurisdiction to review this judgment. See Ruppel v. Gulf Winds Apartments, Inc., 508 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Nielsen v. Joannou, 835 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bartow HMA, LLC v. Kirkland, 146 So. 3d 1213 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)…file a motion in the appellate court under rule 9.400(b), stating the legal basis for the claim.” Rados, 791 So. 2d at 1131-32. This requirement applies equally to certiorari proceedings before the appellate court. See Closuit v. Crane Envtl., Inc., 850 So. 2d 652, 653 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Absent an appellate court’s authorization, a circuit court has “no authority to award attorneys’ fees for services in [the appellate] court, even as a sanction.” Id. at 653 (emphasis added) (reversing portion of judgment awa…
-
Benny G. Santiago v. Sunset Cove Invs., Inc., 198 So. 3d 658 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)…s. See id. “Absent an appellate court’s authorization, a circuit court has ‘no authority to award attorney’s -fees for services in [the appellate] court, even as ■a sanction.’ ” Id. ■ (alteration iru original) (quoting Closuit v. Crane Envtl., Inc., 850 So. 2d 652, 653 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)). It is undisputed that Strnset Cove never sought appéllate fees during prior appeals' between the parties in this court, nor did this court ever authorize such an award. We reject Sunset Cove’s contention that Santiago waiv…
Authorities Cited
- Ruppel v. Gulf Winds Apts., Inc., 508 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
- Bjarne Frydenlund Nielsen v. Pavlo Joannou, 835 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
- Goodykoontz v. State, 830 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)