JAMES EDWARD BELL, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAMES EDWARD BELL, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
851 So. 2d 253
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s revocation of probation and the sentence imposed upon James Edward Bell for violating his probation. However, we remand the cause for entry of a written order providing the specific reasons for concluding Bell violated his probation, as both the State and the Public Defender agree that no such written order appears in the record. See Cifuentes v. State, 717 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
Affirmed, but remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shuler v. State, 7 So. 3d 648 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…PER CURIAM. We affirm the revocation of Defendant’s probation and the sentence imposed. We remand, however, for entry of a written revocation order listing the grounds for the violation. See Bell v. State, 851 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Rodriguez v. State, 820 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Cifuentes v. State, 717 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Affirmed and remanded with instructions.…
Authorities Cited
- Faircloth v. State, 717 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
- Renaldo Antonio Lettsome v. State, 717 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)