JARIUS A. MCTAGGART, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2003-08-06
No. 3D02-794
Before GERSTEN, GODERICH, and SHEVIN, JJ.
851 So. 2d 286 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Williams v. State, 110 So. 2d 654 (Fla.1959).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Guobaitis v. Sherrer, 18 So. 3d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
    …f fact’ including ‘findings necessary to advise the parties or the reviewing court of the trial court’s rationale for the distribution of marital assets and allocation of liabilities’ ” (quoting § 61.075(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (2003))); Bailey v. Bailey, 851 So. 2d 286, 287 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (“[I]f a court’s distribution of the marital assets is disproportionate, then the court must make written findings in support of its distribution.”); Maddox v. Maddox, 750 So. 2d 693, 694 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (“A trial court m…
  • Neli Montalvo v. Montalvo, 949 So. 2d 350 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
    …g factors in Florida Statutes section 61.075 (2006), and explaining reasons for the unequal distribution. See, e.g., Boutwell v. Adams, 920 So. 2d 151, 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Peacock v. Peacock, 879 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Bailey v. Bailey, 851 So. 2d 286, 287 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). On remand, the trial court must reconsider the distribution scheme and either effect an equal distribution or make findings necessary to support unequal distribution. Additionally, we note that the trial court may consider t…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw