ROBERT S. YOUNG, PETITIONER,
v.
ALICE G. HECTOR, RESPONDENT

Fla. 3d DCA | 2003-06-25
No. 3D03-1561
Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and GREEN, JJ.
851 So. 2d 762 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003) Negative Treatment
Cited by 5 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Robert S. Young, seeks certiorari review on a plethora of issues in this tortuously over-litigated case. By and large, we deny certiorari on all issues, save one. Because the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction in freezing assets in a purported trust account without either a basis in the pleadings or the evidence, the order freezing the trust account proceeds is quashed. See Young v. Young, 816 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); City of Miami Beach v. Swedroe, 788 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Resil v. Resil, 755 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

We further note that the trial court would not allow the petitioner, who was neither disrespectful nor disruptive, to speak to his attorney. The court stated: “No, you may not speak to your attorney in this hearing. You may give your attorney a note. Is that clear?” This, we believe is somewhat improper. Certiorari granted, in part; order quashed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Allstate Ins. Co. v. Holy Cross Hosp., Inc., 961 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 2007)
    …Holy Cross Hospital, Inc., 895 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Fifth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Central Florida Physiatrists, P.A., 851 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (CFP )1 The conflict issue is whether a personal injury protection (PIP) insurer must comply with the requirements of section 627.736(10), Florida Statutes (2006), in order to pay PIP benefits based on a reduced rate that a medic…
  • Ivon Mesa v. BMW OF N. Am., LLC, 904 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
    …ubject to the standard manufacturer’s express warranty.” Accordingly, under Florida law, Mesa was entitled to enforce the rights arising from the manufacturer’s express warranty. See Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Central [*458] Fla. Physiatrists, 851 So. 2d 762, 766 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); see also Collins Co. v. Carboline Co., 125 Ill.2d 498, 127 Ill.Dec. 5, 532 N.E. 2d 834, 839 (1988). If Mesa could not enforce the warranty against BMWNA, South Motors, or BMW Financial Services, the manufacturer’s promises…
  • …the no-fault law. In light of the actual impact on the PIP insureds who may choose to use PPO providers, the appellees’ argument rings hollow. IV. CONFLICTING AUTHORITY In Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Central Florida Physiatrists, P.A., 851 So. 2d 762, 766 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003), a case involving factual circumstances similar to those before us now, the Fifth District held that the “[insurer] was required to comply with the provisions of section 627.736(10) in order to take advantage of the option o…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw