MARIE J. BIENAIME, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
MARIE J. BIENAIME, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
853 So. 2d 1119
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See St. Augustine Church v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 754 So. 2d 183, 185 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (employee was guilty of misconduct where record contained competent substantial evidence to support referee finding of insubordination); see also Stahl v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 502 So. 2d 78, 79 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (insubordinate challenge of foreman’s authority in the presence of other employees constituted misconduct).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Maestas v. State, 76 So. 3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…rsuant to rule 3.800(b)(2), the motion is deemed denied and the subsequent order on the motion is a nullity. Sessions v. State, 907 So. 2d 572, 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (citing Campbell v. State, 789 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)); Wilson v. State, 853 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). . The facial constitutionality of a statute can be raised for the first time on direct appeal. Jean v. State, 764 So. 2d 605, 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Trushin v. State, 425 So. 2d 1126, 1129 (Fla. 1982). . The State is entided…
Authorities Cited
- Stahl v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 502 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- Ruiz v. Shlachtman, 754 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)