GLOBAL TRADING AGENCY, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
CITY NATIONAL BANK CORPORATION, APPELLEE
GLOBAL TRADING AGENCY, INC., APPELLANT,
CITY NATIONAL BANK CORPORATION, APPELLEE
854 So. 2d 215
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Global Trading Agency, Inc., appeals a final summary judgment. We reverse because the record demonstrates that this case was not ripe for summary judgment disposition. See Anderson v. Mount Sinai Med. Ctr., 789 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). There are unresolved genuine issues of material fact whether the customer and the bank exercised ordinary care and whether the bank acted in a commercially reasonable manner. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Emmet Black v. State, 914 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. State v. Williams, 854 So. 2d 215, 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); McCraney v. State, 830 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Wiley v. State, 604 So. 2d 6, 7 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Ferenc v. State, 563 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.…
-
Cook v. State, 885 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…ent on the face of the record, and, therefore, is not cognizable in a Rule 3.800(a) motion. We agree. Cook is challenging his convictions, not his sentences, and such a claim cannot be asserted in a Rule 3.800(a) motion. See e.g., State v. Williams, 854 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), review denied, 869 So. 2d 541 (Fla.2004); State v. Moten, 698 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), review dismissed, 799 So. 2d 218 (Fla.2001). Finding no error in the trial court’s order, we affirm. AFFIRMED. SHARP, W. and PE…
-
Smith v. State, 248 So. 3d 188 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)…eeding, filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, within two years of the date his conviction became final. But a motion attacking the 1996 conviction would clearly be untimely at this point. As we stated in State v. Williams, 854 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), and reiterate here, rule 3.800(a) does not authorize a legal challenge to a conviction: “Because Rule 3.800 provides only an avenue for correcting, modifying, or reducing a sentence,” Appellant’s challenge to an underlying…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Ziebia Porsina v. State, 789 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)