PALAFRUGELL HOLDINGS, INC., A BRITISH VIRGIN ISLAND CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
MARWIN S. CASSEL, ESQ., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARTNER IN BROAD AND CASSEL, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, MARWIN S. CASSEL, P.A., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARTNER IN BROAD AND CASSEL ATTORNEYS AT LAW, BROAD AND CASSEL ATTORNEYS AT LAW, A FLORIDA PARTNERSHIP, AND BROAD AND CASSEL, P.A., A FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a scrivener's error in a prior opinion required republication to correct a misstatement of parties involved in separate claims.
The court is republishing a prior opinion to correct a scrivener's error. The error involved a misstatement of the parties whose rights were considere…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Scrivener'S Error cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
On the court’s own motion, the opinion previously published at 825 So. 2d 937 is republished in order to correct the scrivener’s error detailed below. See Washington v. State, 92 Fla. 740, 110 So. 259, 261 (1926); Beeman v. Island Breakers, 591 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). On page 989, in the right-hand column, the opinion reads as follows:
Resolution of PalafrugeU’s claims against B & C arising out of an alleged breach of fiduciary duty does not affect Hernandez’s rights because the rights between Palafrugell and Hernandez are “separate and distinct” from any rights between Palafrugell and Hernandez. See Great Southern Aircraft Corp. v. Kraus, 132 So. 2d 608, 610 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961).
825 So. 2d at 939.
The sentence is corrected to read as follows:
Resolution of Palafrugell’s claims against B & C arising out of an alleged breach of fiduciary duty does not affect Hernandez’s rights because the rights between Palafrugell and B & C are “separate and distinct” from any rights between Palafrugell and Hernandez. See Great Southern Aircraft Corp. v. Kraus, 132 So. 2d 608, 610 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961).
Except for the above-stated correction, the opinion is otherwise unchanged.
It is so ordered.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Abe Washington v. State, 92 Fla. 740 (Fla. 1926)
- Great S. Aircraft Corp. v. Kraus, 132 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961)
- Palafrugell Holdings, Inc. v. Marwin S. Cassel, 825 So. 2d 937 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
- Beeman v. Island Breakers, 591 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)