RONNIE RALPH HINTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Ronnie Ralph Hinton appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.850 post-conviction motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. The court reversed in part and remanded for an evidentiary hearing on whether Hinton consented to his trial counsel's concession of guilt to certain charges, applying the per se ineffectiveness standard established in Smallwood v. State.
When counsel concedes guilt to charged offenses without the defendant's consent, counsel is presumed per se ineffective and the defendant need not establish prejudice to obtain relief under Rule 3.850. The court reversed the trial court's denial of relief on this ground and remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Hinton consented to his counsel's concessions.
[1] Defense counsel's concession of guilt to a charged offense without the defendant's consent creates a presumption of ineffectiveness, relieving the defendant of the need t…
[2] A defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a post-conviction relief motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel's concession of guilt wit…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“when counsel concedes guilt to a charged offense without his client's consent, counsel is presumed ineffective, and a defendant seeking relief through a 3.850 motion need not establish prejudice”
Establishes the per se ineffectiveness standard for unconsented concessions of guilt
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceHinton was charged with two counts of battery on a law enforcement officer, resisting an officer with violence (felony), resisting an officer without …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Evidentiary Hearing cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Ronnie Ralph Hinton appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, motion for post-conviction relief. Hinton was charged with two counts of battery on a law enforcement officer, resisting an officer with violence (a felony), resisting an officer without violence (a misdemeanor), and criminal mischief (a misdemeanor). A jury found him guilty of resisting an officer with violence, resisting an officer without violence, and criminal mischief. He was sentenced to five years incarceration as a prison releasee reoffender for the felony conviction of resisting an officer with violence, and received time served on the two remaining misdemeanors. We affirmed Hinton’s judgment and sentences on direct appeal. See Hinton v. State, 826 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
Hinton now raises three issues in his 3.850 motion, only one of which is legally sufficient and not refuted by the record. He contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for conceding guilt to some of the charged offenses without his consent. During the opening statement and closing argument, defense counsel conceded Hinton’s guilt to resisting arrest without violence and criminal mischief. This court determined in Smallwood v. State, 809 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), that when counsel concedes guilt to a charged offense without his client’s consent, counsel is presumed ineffective, and a defendant seeking relief through a 3.850 motion need not establish prejudice. Smallwood’s counsel had conceded that his client was guilty of three of five charged felonies, but argued that he was not guilty of the other two charged felonies. See also Nixon v. Singletary, 758 So. 2d 618 (Fla.2000) (holding that if counsel conceded defendant’s guilt to charged offenses in opening and closing argument without defendant’s consent, counsel is per se ineffective); Cooper v. State, 835 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). In the instant case, it appears counsel conceded Hinton’s guilt to charged offenses. We instruct the trial court that in this situation pursuant to Smallwood, prejudice need not be shown when counsel makes a concession without the defendant’s consent.
We affirm the trial court’s order denying relief as to grounds one and two, but reverse the order denying relief as to ground three. We remand to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether defendant consented to counsel’s concession of guilt.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED in part.
PETERSON, THOMPSON and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jireh Randall Kleppinger v. State, 884 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)…ough a rule 3.850 motion need not establish prejudice.” Harvey v. State, 28 Fla. L. Weekly S513, 2003 WL 21511339, — So. 2d - (Fla. July 3, 2003) (citing United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 104 S.Ct. 2039, 80 L.Ed.2d 657 (1984)); Hinton v. State, 854 So. 2d 254, 255 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). This presumption of ineffectiveness applies only to the narrow situation in which a concession “entirely fails to subject the prosecution’s case to meaningful adversarial testing.” Harvey, 28 Fla. L. Weekly S513, — So. 2d -…
Authorities Cited
- Nixon v. Singletary, 758 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 2000)
- Cooper v. State, 835 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
- Smallwood v. State, 809 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)