SEVERINO RAMOS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A defendant should be permitted to withdraw a plea if a proper motion is filed and grounds such as mental weakness or mistake are proven.
Following an open plea of no contest, the defendant filed pro se motions to withdraw his plea and dismiss counsel. The trial court denied the motion t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Habitual Felony Offender Sentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
NORTHCUTT, Judge.
Following the hearing at which the circuit court accepted Severino Ramos’s open plea of no contest to three criminal charges, Ramos timely filed pro se motions to withdraw his plea and to dismiss his court-appointed counsel. At the hearing on the motions, Ramos’s counsel did not advance Ramos’s position. Rather, in open court he disputed the factual allegations on which the motion to withdraw the plea was founded. The court denied the motion, explaining that it could not permit Ramos to withdraw his plea unless there had been an irregularity in the plea hearing. The court did not rule on Ramos’s motion to dismiss his counsel at that time, but it later permitted the attorney to withdraw and appointed new counsel for sentencing. Ramos was eventually sentenced to three twelve-year prison terms as a habitual felony offender, to be served concurrently.
We reverse with directions to hold an evidentiary hearing on Ramos’s motion to withdraw his plea, for the purposes of which Ramos shall be appointed conflict-free counsel. See Garcia v. State, 846 So. 2d 660, 661 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Brown v. State, 835 So. 2d 402, 403 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
For purposes of the proceedings on remand, we note that the circuit court was mistaken in its belief that it could not allow Ramos to withdraw his plea in the absence of some irregularity in the plea colloquy. To the contrary, a defendant should be permitted to withdraw a plea if he files a proper motion and proves that the plea was entered under mental weakness, mistake, surprise, misapprehension, fear, promise, or other circumstances affecting his rights. Soto v. State, 780 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
STRINGER and KELLY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Vaughn v. State, 888 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…Trowell at 81. We therefore grant Vaughn’s motion for belated direct appeal from conviction and sentence, and order appointment of the public defender to review the file and to brief the meritorious issues, if any. Walker at 343; Libretti v. State, 854 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)(absolute right to counsel attaches for an appeal of judgment and sentence). This opinion shall serve as a timely notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence. The circuit court clerk shall promptly certify this opinion and ret…
-
Mahone v. State, 39 So. 3d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)…ng resentencing, apparently still without the required application for determination of indigency status, the trial court found Mahone insolvent for purposes of appeal, yet refused to appoint counsel. The State concedes error. See Libretti v. State, 854 So. 2d 804, 804 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). This is not a case where the record reflects a waiver of counsel or a refusal to complete the required affidavits of insolvency. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new sentencing hearing. REVERSED AND REMANDED. ORFIN…
-
Veal v. State, 895 So. 2d 1280 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…in denying defendant’s request for the assistance of counsel at resentencing, see, e.g., [*1281] Sanchez v. State, 866 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), and on the appeal therefrom. Vaughn v. State, 888 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Libretti v. State, 854 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). The trial court shall vacate defendant’s sentence and appoint counsel to represent defendant on resentencing. Reversed and remanded.…
Authorities Cited
- Garcia v. State, 846 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- Miles Lee Brown v. State, 835 So. 2d 402 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- Soto v. State, 780 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)