F. HEDRICK, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
FLORIDA GARDEN LAND COMPANY, A CORPORATION UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
F. HEDRICK, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
FLORIDA GARDEN LAND COMPANY, A CORPORATION UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
99 Fla. 745
Florida Supreme Court (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cuesta v. Newsom, 102 Fla. 853 (Fla. 1931)…wer to the question involved is not in doubt. If the check had been certified after delivery to the payee then the drawer, Cuesta, Rey & Company, would have been discharged from any obligation thereon. In the case of Bank of Bay Biscayne vs. Bell, 99 Fla. 745, 128 Sou. 491, this Court said: “The principle is that a certificate of .a bank that a check is good is equivalent to acceptance. See Sec. 6926 C. G. L. 1927; Merchants National Bank vs State National Bank, 10 Wall, 604, 19 L. ed. 1008; First Natio…
-
Phipps v. Watson, 108 Fla. 547 (Fla. 1933)…sense as the notes of the bank, it is available to the holder the same as money and continues to perform this function in the course of business till it returns to the bank for redemption and is extinguished by payment. Bank of Bay Biscayne v. Ball, 99 Fla. 745, 128 So. 491; Merchants [*554] National Bank v. State National Bank, 10 Wall (U. S.) 604, 19 L. Ed. 1008. It has been held that as a matter of right and law where one of two parties must suffer a loss, the loss should fall on the one who had the be…
-
United Parcel Serv., Inc. v. World Time Corp. OF Am., 556 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)…eations, Ltd. v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 133 N.J.Super. 543, 337 A. 2d 641 (1975). Second, the certified checks which United Parcel collected were the functional equivalent of cash or cashier’s checks. See [*1224] Bank of Bay Biscayne v. Ball, 99 Fla. 745, 128 So. 491 (1930); 5 Fla.Jur. 2d Banks §§ 217 et seq.; Fla.Stat. §§ 673.410; 673.-411; 673.413; 674.303 (1987); 6 R. Anderson, U.C.C. §§ 3-411.12 et seq. (1984); J. White and R. Summers, U.C.C. § 18 (1988). The final point regards ratification by…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence