JAMES E. BARTLETT AND NELLIE A. BARTLETT, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND JAMES E. BARTLETT, FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS SUIT, APPELLANTS,
v.
SAMUEL HAWKES, APPELLEE
JAMES E. BARTLETT AND NELLIE A. BARTLETT, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND JAMES E. BARTLETT, FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS SUIT, APPELLANTS,
SAMUEL HAWKES, APPELLEE
99 Fla. 754
Florida Supreme Court (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected; and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Bueord, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alsheimer v. Palmer, 105 Fla. 224 (Fla. 1932)…smissing the bill the Circuit Court held that the suit under such condition could only be brought within twelve months after the last furnishing of labor or material. The same question was presented to this Court in the ease of Padgett vs. Douglass, 99 Fla. 754, 127 Sou. 495. In that case the lower court had held that the claimant was entitled to file his suit against the owner at any time within twelve months after the notice of lien was filed. This Court by memorandum order, without opinion, affirmed the…