G.L., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2003-10-08
No. 4D02-2794
POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
855 So. 2d 718 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2003)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the evidence presented was insufficient to establish a violation of the probation condition requiring school attendance, and the State could not affirm the revocation on a different, uncharged condition.


Facts & Procedural History

G.L., a minor, appealed the revocation of his probation. The affidavit of violation alleged he missed school and his whereabouts were unknown. The evi…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
STEVENSON, J.

STEVENSON, J.

G.L., a minor, appeals the revocation of his probation, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. We find merit in his argument and reverse.

Among other things, the conditions of G.L.’s probation required that he attend school. The affidavit of violation alleged that G.L. had missed six weeks of school and his whereabouts were unknown. The evidence presented at the hearing, however, was clearly insufficient to establish that G.L. had failed to attend school during the time he was on probation. Indeed, the State concedes as much on appeal.

Despite the concession, the State invites this court to affirm because the conditions of G.L.’s probation also required that he cooperate with and maintain contact with his probation officer and the evidence did support a violation of this condition. We must decline the invitation as such a violation was not adequately charged. See Critsley v. State, 846 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); N.L. v. State, 825 So. 2d 509 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

REVERSED.

POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw