J.A.D., ON BEHALF OF J.G.D., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Scrivener'S Error cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The defendant pled nolo contendere to, and was adjudicated delinquent on, the charge of battery by a detained person in violation of section 784.082, Florida Statutes. The trial court determined that the defendant met the criteria for being a “serious or habitual juvenile offender” and therefore committed him to a maximum risk residential program until his 21st birthday. See § 985.03(48), Fla. Stat. (2001). However, the disposition order contains a scrivener’s error in its reference to section 985.08(48)(a)(13), Florida Statutes since subsection (a)(13) refers to lewd and lascivious acts and the defendant was not charged with committing a lewd or lascivious act. The State properly eon-cedes the existence of this error, explaining that the statutory reference should be to section 985.03(48)(b), which applies to juveniles who have committed at least two previous delinquent acts. We affirm the instant disposition order but remand to the trial court for correction of the statutory reference.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
PLEUS, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Laveress Hopkins v. State, 105 So. 3d 470 (Fla. 2012)…v. State, 743 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), which affirmed the trial court’s order adjudicating a juvenile guilty of battery upon a fellow detainee in violation of sections 784.03 and 784.082, and the Fifth District’s decision in J.A.D. v. State, 855 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003), which affirmed the trial court’s adjudication of delinquency of battery by detainee pursuant to section 784.082.3 However, the trial court declined to follow J.A. and J.A.D. because T.C. “seem[ed] to be on point and controlling.…
-
Mohamed S. Rashid v. Shanta Rashid, 35 So. 3d 992 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)…2 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Hence, it is an abuse of discretion to award attorney’s fees if the dissolution decree leaves both parties in equal financial positions. Lovell; Matajek v. Skowronska, 927 So. 2d 981, 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Rosado v. Rosado, 855 So. 2d 1199, 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Schiller v. Schiller, 625 So. 2d 856, 862 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). Here, the trial court did more than place Wife in an equal position to Husband; instead, the trial court inequitably distributed assets and placed Wife in a su…
-
Valeri Kouzine v. Kouzine, 44 So. 3d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)…und the parties to be equally positioned financially, it was an abuse of discretion to award attorney’s fees. Rashid v. Rashid, 35 So. 3d 992, 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010); Matajek v. Skowronska, 927 So. 2d 981, 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Rosado v. Rosado, 855 So. 2d 1199, 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); McIntyre v. McIntyre, 434 So. 2d 61, 62 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). For these reasons, we reverse and remand for specific findings as to the distribution of the Jacksonville condominium, if a marital asset, and the $15,000 withd…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence