JEFFREY DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2003-10-10
No. 5D02-1935
SHARP, W., THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
855 So. 2d 1201 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2003)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.1 See Wright v. State, 857 So. 2d 861, 2003 WL 21511313 (Fla. July 3, 2003) (“Habeas corpus should not be used as a vehicle for presenting issues which should have been raised at trial and on appeal or in postconviction proceedings”).

SHARP, W., THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur. . We note that this court has precluded Davis from filing any additional pro se appeals, motions, or petitions pertaining to his convictions and sentences in case No. GO-7844, unless reviewed by an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida, see Davis v. State, 852 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); however, Davis filed this appeal prior to issuance of that mandate.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw