SUZANNE S. HAM, APPELLANT,
v.
SCOTT RYAN DUNMIRE AND ALL AMERICA TERMITE AND PEST CONTROL, INC., APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 2003-10-14
No. 1D02-4564
BARFIELD, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
855 So. 2d 1238 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

As a sanction for failing to furnish a witness list, failing to list or exchange exhibits, and failing to answer interrogatories timely, even after an agreed order compelling the answers had been entered, the trial court dismissed appellant’s complaint with prejudice.

Although the party herself was in no way at fault, we affirm the judgment of dismissal, certifying conflict with the Third District on this point. See Marin v. Batista, 639 So. 2d 630, 630-31 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (“Consequently, since the record reflects absolutely no malfeasance on the part of the appellant, we find that the trial court abused its discretion by dismissing the appellant’s case.”); Dave’s Aluminum Siding, Inc. v. C & M Ventures, 582 So. 2d 147, 147-48 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Herr, 589 So. 2d 542, 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Affirmed.

BARFIELD, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • HAM v. Dunmire, 891 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 2004)
    …LEWIS, J. We have for review the decision in Ham v. Dunmire, 855 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), which certified conflict with the Third District Court of Appeal’s decisions in Marin v. Batista, 639 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), Dave’ s Aluminum Siding, Inc. v. C & M Ventures, 582 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), and United…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw