SCOTT M. MEIDE, APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT GIBSON, AN INDIVIDUAL, MARY GIBSON, AN INDIVIDUAL, GIBSON CHIROPRACTIC OFFICE, P.A., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, MULTI-STATE PROFESSIONAL CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, D/B/A MSPM ACCIDENT & INJURY CLINIC, APPELLEES
SCOTT M. MEIDE, APPELLANT,
ROBERT GIBSON, AN INDIVIDUAL, MARY GIBSON, AN INDIVIDUAL, GIBSON CHIROPRACTIC OFFICE, P.A., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, MULTI-STATE PROFESSIONAL CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, D/B/A MSPM ACCIDENT & INJURY CLINIC, APPELLEES
855 So. 2d 1239
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s September 9, 2003 order, this appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See IDS Long Distance, Inc. v. Heiffer, 837 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Bravender, 700 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Malone v. Costin, 410 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
KAHN, WEBSTER and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)…order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(k) when the judgment resolves a distinct and severable cause of action, i.e., the remaining claims do not arise from a set of common facts or a single transaction. See Pace v. Waste Mgmt., Inc., 855 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Croteau v. Operator Service Co., 721 So. 2d 386, 387 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (providing test for determining “severable distinct causes of action” appealable under Mendez v. West Flagler Family Ass’n., 303 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1974)). The…
-
Sherron Hobbie Hargrove, Jr. v. Meadows Dev. OF Nw. Fla., Inc., 888 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)….130. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.030(b)(1). Additionally, the appellant’s motion below raised issues that are factually related to issues raised in the complaint and counterclaim, which remain pending in the trial court. See Pace v. Waste Management, Inc. 855 So. 2d 1239, 1240 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (providing that claims stemming from a single transaction and the same set of facts are related). Therefore, the instant order is not a partial final judgment. Id. DISMISSED. ERVIN, BARFIELD, and KAHN, JJ„ concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Malone v. Costin, 410 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- IDS Long Distance, Inc. v. Heiffer, 837 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Bravender, 700 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)