STEVEN EARL HUTCHINSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
STEVEN EARL HUTCHINSON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
856 So. 2d 1108
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2003)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges the revocation of his probation, where the court did not indicate which particular conditions were violated. Because this is required under cases such as Rogers v. State, 635 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), the appealed orders are reversed and the case is remanded for entry of a written order specifying the conditions which the court found to have been violated. See also, e.g., Jones v. State, 638 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Brundage v. State, 598 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
ERVIN, ALLEN and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Jones v. State, 638 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
- Aushua Rogers v. State, 635 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)