THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
ELDRICK WENDALL WOODING, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
We affirm this case for the reasons expressed in Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). See Dade County Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So. 2d 638, 644 (Fla.1999) (stating: “even though a trial court’s ruling is based on improper reasoning, the ruling will be upheld if there is any theory or principle of law in the record which would support the ruling.”). See also Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (providing: “[e]ven when based on erroneous reasoning, a conclusion or decision of a trial court will generally be affirmed if the evidence or an alternative theory supports it.”).
Before COPE, GREEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Denied. See Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
GREEN and FLETCHER, JJ., concur. COPE, J.
I would grant rehearing in part for the reasons stated in my partial dissent in Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Eldrick Wendall Wooding, 940 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 2006)…PER CURIAM. We have for review State v. Wooding, 858 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), which cites to a case that was pending review in this Court (Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), reversed sub nom. Milks v. State, 894 So. 2d 924, 925 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 368, 163 L.Ed.2d…1 / 3
-
State v. Eldrick Wooding, 984 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
- Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station Wqba, 731 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 1999)
- Ferman Carlos Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)