DAVID R. BARTELS, APPELLANT,

v.

JANET L. BARTELS, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Florida House OF Representatives v. The Honorable Charles J. Crist, Jr., 999 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 2008)
  …the Governor or the Legislature, as opposed to addressing the actual jurisdictionally based question of whether the Governor or the Legislature possesses the authority to act with regard to the challenge presented. Cf. O’Donnell’s Corp. v. Ambroise, 858 So. 2d 1138, 1142 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (Sawaya, J., specially concurring) (“[T]o allow the use of prohibition in the instant case would, in my view, completely vitiate the limitations [*622] placed upon use of the writ and convert it from an extraordinary writ t…
• Allan & Conrad, Inc. v. Univ. OF Cent. Fla., 961 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
  …ysis and holding of the majority opinion. I write separately to fully explain the reasons for my decision to dismiss the Petition for Writ of Prohibition. Those reasons are explained in my concurring opinion in O’Donnell’s Corp. v. [*1088] Ambroise, 858 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003), which states: Because prohibition is preventative, it may not be used to revoke an order already entered. English; State ex rel. Harris v. McCauley, 297 So. 2d 825 (Fla.1974); State ex rel. R.C. Motor Lines, Inc. v. Boyd, 114…
• PRO Tech Monitoring, Inc. v. State, 72 So. 3d 277 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
  …to distinguish Machules, the Department contends that equitable doctrines may not be applied to the deadline for filing a formal bid protest petition under section 120.57(3) because this deadline is jurisdictional. In O’Donnell’s Corp. v. Ambroise, 858 So. 2d 1138, 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003), the Fifth District observed that Florida courts had “consistently held that late filing of a request for an administrative hearing is not jurisdictional, but is analogous to a statute of limitations which is subject to equ…