DENNIS DALE GREMMELS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2003-11-07
No. 2D02-4673
SALCINES and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
858 So. 2d 1167 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2003)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Appellant Gremmels was convicted of resisting arrest with violence and sentenced to one year in county jail plus five years' probation, which exceeded the statutory five-year maximum for a third-degree felony. The court reversed and remanded because the trial court declined to impose a lawful alternative sentence and clearly intended the illegal combined sentence.


Holding

The court reversed and remanded for imposition of a lawful sentence, declining to order a Villery sentence because the trial court declined that opportunity when given the chance and clearly intended to impose the illegal combined sentence.


Headnotes

[1] A sentence exceeding the statutory maximum is illegal.

[2] A court may not impose a corrected sentence that is inconsistent with the trial court's clear intent, even if the corrected sentence would be legal.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“because the combined sentence exceeds the five-year statutory maximum, the sentence was illegal”

Establishes the legal basis for finding the sentence unlawful

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Gremmels was convicted of resisting arrest with violence, a third-degree felony. The trial court sentenced him to one year in county jail followed by …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
VILLANTI, Judge.

VILLANTI, Judge.

Following his conviction for resisting arrest with violence, a third-degree felony, see § 843.01, Fla. Stat. (2001), Dennis Dale Gremmels was sentenced to one year in county jail followed by five years’ probation. As the State properly concedes, because the combined sentence exceeds the five-year statutory maximum, the sentence was illegal. See § 775.082, Fla. Stat. (2001); State v. Holmes, 360 So. 2d 380, 383 (Fla.1978); Baker v. State, 652 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). However, the State argues that this court need only remand with directions for the trial court to impose a Villery sentence, as the trial court’s intent was to make the county jail sentence a special condition of the five years’ probation. See Villery v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm’n, 396 So. 2d 1107 (Fla.1980). We decline to do so for two reasons.

First, the trial court declined the opportunity to impose a Villery sentence when Gremmels filed a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(1)(B). Second, the record is clear that the trial court intended to impose the exact illegal sentence being appealed. We are not free to order a specific corrected sentence that is inconsistent with the trial court’s intent simply because the corrected sentence would be legal. Cf. Jackson v. State, 615 So. 2d 850, 851 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (ordering correction of orally pronounced sentence to comport with intent, clearly established in record, of trial court and counsel for the State and defendant). We therefore reverse and remand for imposition of a lawful sentence.

Reversed and remanded.

SALCINES and DAVIS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw