LIZA A. PARK, PETITIONER,

v.

GLORIA E. CHAFIN, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Byrd v. S. Prestressed Concrete, Inc., 928 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
  …Ins. Co. v. Cimino, 754 So. 2d at 701-02 (noting, among other things, that “[t]he concerns of physicians for conducting examinations without the distraction of third persons cannot outweigh the [examinee’s] rights”). Accord Chavez v. J & L Drywall, 858 So. 2d 1266, 1268-69 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Wilkins v. Palumbo, 617 So. 2d at 852-53; Toucet v. Big Bend Moving & Storage, Inc., 581 So. 2d 952, 953-54 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Bartell v. McCarrick, 498 So. 2d at 1379-80. As was true of his testimony in Freeman, Dr.…
• W. Fla. Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. SEE, 18 So. 3d 676 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
  …iorari relief, the petitioner must demonstrate that the order under review departs from the essential requirements of law and will cause irreparable harm, i.e. harm that cannot be remedied on appeal. See Chavez v. J & L Drywall & Travelers Ins. Co., 858 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). The irreparable-harm inquiry is an issue of jurisdiction, and thus, must be undertaken first. Olges v. Dougherty, 856 So. 2d 6, 10 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Often, orders granting discovery are reviewed by certiorari under the ration…
• Yodelmis Vazquez v. Wendy's and Ace-Usa, 931 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
  …reparable harm. It is an established principle of law that interlocutory orders requiring mental or physical examinations cause harm of a kind that cannot be remedied on appeal from a final judgment. See Chavez v. J & L Drywall & Travelers Ins. Co., 858 So. 2d 1266, 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Olges v. Dougherty, 856 So. 2d 6, 10 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Taylor v. Columbia/HCA Doctors Hosp., 746 So. 2d 1244, 1245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). “In the context of compelled physical or psychiatric examinations, the required ele…

Authorities Cited

• Henry's Off. Supplies & Northbrook/Allstate Ins. Co. v. Henry, 724 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)