VEL TYLER, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
VEL TYLER, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
859 So. 2d 628
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Vel Tyler petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, contending that the Circuit Court in and for Alachua County has unreasonably delayed disposition of his motion for postconvietion relief. Having now considered the petition and the response filed on behalf of respondent State of Florida, we agree with petitioner. See Bernard v. State, 734 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
The petition for writ of mandamus is granted and the circuit court is directed to act on the motion within 30 days of issuance of mandate in this proceeding by either acting on the motion or by entering an order which sets an evidentiary hearing to be conducted within a reasonable time after entry of the order. PETITION GRANTED.
ERVIN, BOOTH and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fitzgerald v. Osceola Cnty. Sch. Bd. & Fla. Sch. Bd. Ins. Tr., 974 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)…opinion does not mean the JCC could not have used the opinions Dr. Haim did formulate in resolving this case. The EMA should assist the JCC in making factual findings based on conflicting medical evidence. See Broward Children’s Ctr., Inc. v. Hall, 859 So. 2d 628, 626 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). If the JCC misinterprets an EMA’s testimony to stand for a position that the EMA did not actually adopt, reversal and remand is appropriate. See Bellamy v. Hi-Stat Mfg. Co., 668 So. 2d 230, 232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (“Because…
Authorities Cited
- Herring v. State, 734 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)