JOSE M. MORALES, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Backus v. State, 864 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
  …border search exception. As a result, the denial of Backus’s motion to suppress the cocaine is affirmed. AFFIRMED. FARMER, C.J., GUNTHER and MAY, JJ., concur. . We are aware of the Third District’s opinion in Benson v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd., 859 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. 3d DCA Nov.5, 2003). However, because Benson addresses a matter of state law, a tort suit, its discussion of Florida’s state borders is not controlling on the Fourth Amendment issue raised in the case at bar.…
• Fla. Dep't OF Revenue v. NEW SEA Escape Cruises, Ltd., 894 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 2005)
  …elow that the Gulf Stream was at a distance greater than three miles off of the Atlantic Coast during the relevant time period, so a seaward boundary of three miles will be assumed for the instant analysis. Cf. Benson v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd.., 859 So. 2d 1213, 1216-17 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (holding that medical malpractice occurring on a cruise ship 11.7 miles off of Florida's coast occurred within Florida's territorial waters based on expert evidence establishing that the Gulf Stream was 14 nautical miles…
• REY v. Philip Morris, Inc., 75 So. 3d 378 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
  …defendants which manufactured the cigarettes used by the plaintiff.” No Florida appellate decision “is authority on any question not raised and considered, although it may be involved in the facts of the case.” Benson v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd., 859 So. 2d 1213, 1217 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (quoting State ex rel. Helseth v. Du Bose, 99 Fla. 812, 128 So. 4, 6 (1930)). Our analysis is based also on our decisions regarding civil conspiracy claims generally. In Charles v. Florida Foreclosure Placement Center, LLC,…

Authorities Cited

• THE Florida BAR v. Mullins, 527 So. 2d 1380 (Fla. 1988)
• Fambro v. State, 581 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)