JELKES JONES, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
JELKES JONES, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
99 Fla. 1183
Florida Supreme Court (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the criminal court of record be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Century Tr. Co. of Baltimore v. The Allison Realty Co., 105 Fla. 456 (Fla. 1932)…plaint to enforce the lien was not filed until May 19, 1928, which was more than twelve months from the performance of the work or the furnishing of the material. Bowery vs. Babbit, 99 Fla. 1151, 128 So. 801. Weaver-Loughridge Lumber Co. vs. Hobson, 99 Fla. 1183, 128 So. 642; Anderson vs. Dade Lbr. Co., 101 Fla. 38, 133 So. 321. On the other hand, if work was in progress, or material was furnished on or after May 10, 1927, neither the lien nor the right to enforce it was lost, and the mortgagee under the t…