DENZIA WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Jarp v. Jarp, 919 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …So. 2d 513 (Fla.1993); Mulligan v. Mulligan, 877 So. 2d 791, 792 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). In determining whether the motion is legally sufficient, the allegations “must be taken as true and must be viewed from the movant’s perspective.” Siegel v. State, 861 So. 2d 90, 92 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). In denying the motion for disqualification, the trial judge cited to Town Centre of Islamorada, Inc. v. Overby, 592 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). In Town Centre, this court held that disqualification was not required when…
• Gephtherson Louissant v. State, 125 So. 3d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
  …that the detective has committed perjury.” Id. The proper “inquiry focuses on whether the defendant may reasonably question a judge’s impartiality rather than whether the judge perceives she is able to act fairly and impartially.” Siegel v. State, 861 So. 2d 90, 92 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). In this case, the trial judge’s statement that appellant had perjured himself would create a well-founded fear in a reasonably prudent person that the person would not receive a fair and impartial hearing. In conclusion, we…
• D.H. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 12 So. 3d 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
  …e review of the denial of her motion for disqualification by the usual means, a petition for the “extraordinary remedy” of a writ of prohibition. See Dep’t of Children & Family Servs. v. J.C., 847 So. 2d 487, 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Siegel v. State, 861 So. 2d 90, 92 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Hill, 564 So. 2d at 609; Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 28.3 at 690 n. 11 (“Prohibition is an appropriate remedy to review the denial of a motion to disqualify the judge.”). First, we note that in our decis…

Authorities Cited

• Gonzales v. State, 779 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)