THE STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
ROGER ARSHAM, RESPONDENT
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
ROGER ARSHAM, RESPONDENT
861 So. 2d 113
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Because the showing made by the criminal defendant below was totally insufficient to justify a bodily intrusion into the privacy of the alleged victim, the order requiring her to provide a DNA sample is quashed. See State v. Famiglietti 817 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), review dis missed, 838 So. 2d 528 (Fla.2003); State v. Kuntsman, 643 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); State v. Brewster, 601 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Bartlett v. Hamwi, 626 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).
Certiorari granted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Huntsman, 643 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
- State v. Famiglietti, 817 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
- Bartlett v. Hamwi, 626 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
- State v. Brewster, 601 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
- Famiglietti v. State, 838 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 2003)