STEVEN OCCHIOGROSSO, APPELLANT,

v.

AMERICAN LUMBER & SUPPLY AND SENTRY CLAIMS SERVICE, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Storer, 920 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
  …er over which the trial court had no discretion. On at least three other occasions, the State has failed to obtain success on a petition for writ of certiorari when attempting to prevent the defense from introducing evidence. In State v. Sealy-Doe, 861 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), the court refused to quash an order allowing the defendant to introduce sworn statements at trial from a critical, unavailable witness, reasoning that the order did not substantially impair the State’s ability to bring its case.…
• State v. Torry M. Jones, 30 So. 3d 619 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
  …r or how the legal error “substantially impair[ed] the ability of the state to prosecute its case.” State v. Pettis, 520 So. 2d 250, 253 (Fla.1988) (quoting State v. Steinbrecher, 409 So. 2d 510, 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)); see also State v. Sealy-Doe, 861 So. 2d 530, 531 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (dismissing the State’s petition for writ of certiorari because the challenged ruling did not “substantially impair the state’s ability to bring its case”); State v. Storer, 920 So. 2d 754, 759 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (denying ce…
• State v. Sandoval, 125 So. 3d 213 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
  …ust be remembered that the extraordinary writ is reserved for those situations where there has been a violation of a clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice.”) (citation and quotations omitted); State v. Sealy-Doe, 861 So. 2d 530, 531 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (‘We have the authority to grant such a writ where the state establishes a violation of a clearly established principle of law, resulting in a miscarriage of justice, if the pretrial ruling substantially impairs the state’s…

Authorities Cited

• Williams v. State, 858 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)