W. H. D. STEWART AND MAGGIE STEWART, HIS WIFE, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
JAMES W. MARTIN AND FRANK C. RATHJE, AS TRUSTEES UNDER THE WILL OF WALLACE R. MARTIN, DECEASED, AND BANK OF BAY BISCAYNE, A CORPORATION, APPELLEES
W. H. D. STEWART AND MAGGIE STEWART, HIS WIFE, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
JAMES W. MARTIN AND FRANK C. RATHJE, AS TRUSTEES UNDER THE WILL OF WALLACE R. MARTIN, DECEASED, AND BANK OF BAY BISCAYNE, A CORPORATION, APPELLEES
99 Fla. 1249
Florida Supreme Court (1930)
Caution
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Tedder, 123 Fla. 188 (Fla. 1936)…r bill of particulars the court held in substance that the exhibits attached to the declaration sufficiently complied with the statute, Sec. 4313, Par. 2, C. G. L., supra, and Rule 14 of Circuit Courts Law Actions. In the case of Humphrey v. Bussey, 99 Fla. 1249, 128 South. Rep. 841, referred to in the court’s opinion, the first count of the declaration, which was in all substantial respects the same as the first count of the declaration in the case at bar, was held good on demurrer, and it was held that st…
-
McMULLEN v. McMULLEN, 145 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)…Land Co., 1851, 4 Fla. 200, and by the Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth District, in Badger Silver Mining Co. v. Drake, C.C.A. 5th, 1898, 88 F. 48. Appellants contend that the common law rule has been modified in Florida by Humphrey v. Bussey, 1930, 99 Fla. 1249, 128 So. 841 and Ballas v. Lake Weir Light & Water Co., 1930, 100 Fla. 913, 130 So. 421. We do not think so. In Humphrey the decision was made upon the ground that the action was based upon an implied promise to pay for the land by the parties who c…
-
Pittman v. Roberts, 122 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)…ipal is the contract of the principal. This rule as to liability of an undisclosed principal applies to a simple executory contract or one not fully performed. Collins v. Aetna Ins. Co., 1931, 103 Fla. 848, 138 So. 369; and Humphrey v. Bussey, 1930, 99 Fla. 1249, 128 So. 841. For an undisclosed principal to be held for the acts of his alleged agent, the relation of principal and agent must be proved. This may be accomplished through circumstantial as well as through direct evidence. Parol evidence is admis…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence