ROBERT WILLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2003-11-19
No. 2D03-314
SALCINES and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
862 So. 2d 97 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Topics
Restitution Amount Plea Agreement

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Restitution Amount cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
WHATLEY, Judge.

WHATLEY, Judge.

On January 13, 2003, Robert Willey filed this appeal to challenge the amount of restitution the trial court ordered him to pay at a December 16, 2002 hearing. He contends that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay $220 in restitution because the victim suffered a loss of only $120. Appellate counsel sought and was granted leave from this court to have the record supplemented with the restitution order entered on December 16, 2002. The circuit court clerk certified that no order of restitution was filed as a result of the hearing on that date.

At Willey’s sentencing hearing on November 6, 2002, the trial court orally ordered that Willey pay, consistent with his plea agreement, $60 in restitution. The order of probation filed on January 13, 2003, reflects that restitution amount. Accordingly, we affirm the restitution amount of $60.

Affirmed.

SALCINES and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Vaughn v. Boerckel, 20 So. 3d 443 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
    …736.1002(1), Florida Statutes, which creates individual personal liability of a trustee for damages for breach of trust. The standard of review applicable to a motion to amend a complaint is abuse of discretion. G.B. Holdings, Inc. v. Steinhauser, 862 So. 2d 97, 99 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Refusal to allow an amendment is an abuse of the trial court’s discretion “unless it clearly appears that allowing the amendment would prejudice the opposing party, the privilege to amend has been abused, or amendment would…
  • Endacott v. Int'l Hospitality, Inc., 910 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
    …for punitive damages. We review the trial court’s refusal to permit Endacott to amend his pleadings for abuse of discretion. See Williams v. Palm Beach Cmty. Coll. Found., Inc., 862 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); G.B. Holdings, Inc. v. Steinhauser, 862 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). We find that the trial court properly denied Endacott’s motion for leave to amend his complaint to add a claim against H & K for punitive damages. In order to recover punitive damages, the plaintiff must provide the court with…
  • ARCH Specialty Ins. Co. v. Kubicki Draper, LLP, 137 So. 3d 487 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
    …ett Painting Co. v. Padula & Wadsworth Constr., Inc., 856 So. 2d 1059, 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (citations omitted). “The standard of review applicable to a motion to amend a complaint ... is abuse of discretion.” G.B. Holdings, Inc. v. Steinhauser, 862 So. 2d 97, 99 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (citations omitted). A trial court’s denial of a motion to amend to substitute parties is also reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Estate of Eisen v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 126 So. 3d 323, 327 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (citations…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw