DASHIWA CORPORATION, ETC., APPELLANT.
v.
TASHI VALLEY, INC., ETC., APPELLEE
DASHIWA CORPORATION, ETC., APPELLANT.
TASHI VALLEY, INC., ETC., APPELLEE
862 So. 2d 780
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Because the lessee did not establish that there were any special circumstances which would warrant relief from the consequences of its failure to give written timely notice of its intent to renew the lease, we affirm the orders under review. Dugan v. Haige, 54 So. 2d 201 (Fla.1951); Thrifty Dutchman, Inc. v. Florida Supermarkets, Inc., 541 So. 2d 634, 636 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 551 So. 2d 461 (Fla.1989); Investment Builders of Fla., Inc. v. S.U.S Food Mkt. Invs., Inc., 753 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Esaw v. Esaw, 965 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)…the party asserting that the other spouse is voluntarily unemployed has the burden of proof on the issue of imputation of income. The wife asserts that this portion of the final judgment is fundamentally erroneous on its face. See Hoirup v. Hoirup, 862 So. 2d 780, 782 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (“[Wjhere a trial transcript or proper substitute does not appear in the record on appeal, the trial court’s order must be upheld unless the order is fundamentally erroneous on its face.”); see also Chirino v. Chirino, 710 So…
-
Massam v. Massam, 993 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)…Stat. (2004); see Tucker v. Tucker, 966 So. 2d 25, 26-27 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). The trial court also may distribute assets unequally, provided it supplies specific findings of fact to justify its unequal distribution. See § 61.075(1); Hoirup v. Hoirup, 862 So. 2d 780, 782 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Cooper v. Cooper, 639 So. 2d 153, 155 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Moore v. Moore, 679 So. 2d 1311, 1311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). On remand, the trial court shall revisit its equitable distribution consistent with this opinion. We affirm…
-
Siegel v. Bettie I. Whitaker, 946 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…essly predicated on matters contained in the complaint and attachments thereto. The thrust of the former husband’s complaint is twofold: (1) that the Capri/Prieto claim was a chose in action which constituted marital property, see Hoirup v. Hoirup, 862 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (referring to chose in action as a marital asset), which (2) was retained by the former husband under paragraph 6 of the MSA. The former wife concedes the claim was marital property but maintains that it was distributed to her un…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Dugan v. Haige, 54 So.2d 201 (Fla. 1951)
- Thrifty Dutchman, Inc. v. Fla. Supermarkets, Inc., 541 So. 2d 634 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
- Inv. Builders OF Fla., Inc. v. S.U.S. Food Mkt. Invs., Inc., 753 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)