JAMES R. PACCIONE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Wyon Dale Childers v. State, 936 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
  …ts appellant had made upon his arrest); • Jackson v. State, 881 So. 2d 711, 713 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (finding the trial court erred in refusing to allow appellant to impeach State witness with statements made during deposition); • Mitchell v. State, 862 So. 2d 908, 912 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (finding trial court’s limitation of cross-examination improper because “the credibility of the defendant and the alleged victim, on the one hand, and one of the State’s chief witnesses, on the other, were crucial to the cas…
• Brown v. State, 927 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Paccione v. State, 862 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Szuch v. State, 780 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Conflict is certified with King v. State, 911 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), and Kidd v. State, 855 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). STONE, FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur.…
• Minus v. State, 901 So. 2d 344 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …of evidence that a criminal defendant seeks to admit to show bias or prejudice, or to attack the credibility of a testifying witness, is broader than that of a civil defendant because of the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights. See Mitchell v. State, 862 So. 2d 908, 912 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Barows v. State, 805 So. 2d 120, 122-23 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). As we explained in Jones v. State, 577 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991): In Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 94 S.Ct. 1105, 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974), it was held that “…

Authorities Cited

• Szuch v. State, 780 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)