RUBY C. ADAMS, APPELLANT,

v.

LENNIE ALLEN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Clark v. Bluewater Key RV Ownership Park Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc., 226 So. 3d 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
  …in the Declaration Our consideration of this argument by the defendants/appellants is subject to de novo review. Gem Estates Mobile Home Vill. Ass’n v. Bluhm, 885 So. 2d 435, 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (citing Klak v. Eagles’ Reserve Homeowners’ Ass’n, 862 So. 2d 947, 954 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)). When interpreting restrictive covenants, the courts “should give effect to the commonly understood meaning of the words of the pertinent provisions.” Gem Estates, 885 So. 2d at 437. Such covenants are to be strictly constru…
• GEM Ests. Mobile Home Vill. Ass'n, Inc. v. Bluhm, 885 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
  …obile home, the circuit court denied the application for injunctive relief. Analysis The trial court’s ruling regarding the meaning of the restrictive covenant provisions is subject to de novo review. See Klak v. Eagles’ Reserve Homeowners’ Ass’n, 862 So. 2d 947, 954 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); see also Kaplan v. Bayer, 782 So. 2d 417, 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (“Because interpretation of a contract is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review.”). In interpreting restrictive covenant provisions, a court…
• RTM Gen. Contractors, Inc. v. G/W Riverwalk, LLC, 893 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
  …sufficient argument to support the conclusion that [*586] application of the law of the case will result in a manifest injustice. See Fla. Dep’t of Transp. v. Juliano, 801 So. 2d 101, 105-06,108 (Fla.2001); Klak v. Eagles’ Reseñe Homeowner’s Ass’n, 862 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).…

Authorities Cited

• Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
• Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)