DEANDRE BAKER, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 2003-11-13
No. SC01-2315
WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur., ANSTEAD, C.J., dissents.
863 So. 2d 293 Florida Supreme Court (2003)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We granted review of Baker v. State, 793 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), based upon the district court’s certification of conflict with the opinion in Lester v. State, 737 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. However, after further consideration, we decline to exercise our discretion to review this mat ter. Accordingly, the petition for review is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, C.J., dissents.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw