SAMUEL L. FREDERICK, SR., APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
SAMUEL L. FREDERICK, SR., APPELLANT,
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
864 So. 2d 454
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Because evidence in the record supports the result below, we must affirm the denial of unemployment compensation benefits to the appellant.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Off. OF Ins. Reg. & Fin. Servs. Comm'n v. Serv. Ins. Co., 50 So. 3d 637 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…n existing rule at any time during the existence of the rule.” § 120.56(3)(a) (emphasis added). This statute does not authorize a rule challenge to a rule that is no longer in existence. See id.; Dep’t of Revenue v. Sheraton Bal Harbour Ass’n, Ltd., 864 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Once a rule’s enabling statute is repealed, the rule itself automatically expires. Canal Ins. Co. v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 489 So. 2d 136, 138 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (citing Hulmes v. Div. of Ret., Dep’t of Admin., 418 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 1…