ISRAEL CARRILLO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to correct the final judgment as to the degree of crime for which the defendant was convicted. See Copcutt v. State, 477 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)(case remanded to correct degree of crime for which defendant was convicted). The final judgment classifies the burglary of an unoccupied dwelling as a second degree felony when it should be categorized as a third degree felony. See § 810.02(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). This change does not affect the defendant’s current sentence as he was sentenced as a habitual offender. Affirmed but remanded to the trial court for correction of the final judgment as directed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Madonna Sue Jervis Wise v. Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., 930 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)…ntial, competent evidence established in the record of the administrative hearing, it will be overturned. § 120.68(7) Fla. Stat. (2005). But an appellate court reviews the agency’s conclusions of law de novo. Steward v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 865 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Section 120.57(1)(Z), Florida Statutes (2005), part of the Administrative Procedure Act, somewhat circumscribes the authority of the Division in reviewing an administrative law judge’s determination: (l) The agency may adopt t…
-
Abbott Labs. v. Mylan Pharms., Inc., 15 So. 3d 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…Such a result is not supported by any authority. Section 165.0251 We now turn to the merits of the parties’ arguments with respect to section [*654] 465.0251. We review an ALJ’s conclusions of law de novo. Steward v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 865 So. 2d 528, 530 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Further, because the issues we consider here are primarily those of statutory or constitutional interpretation, our standard of review for those issues is also de novo. Fla. Hosp. Waterman, Inc. v. Buster, 984 So. 2d 478, 4…
-
C.F. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 934 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…nition as per the above cited authorities for the PCA services. LEGAL ANALYSIS First, we review this case de novo because an agency’s final order based on a conclusion of law is subject to de no review. See Steward v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 865 So. 2d 528, 530 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). In addition, this Court may set aside an agency action when it finds that the agency has erroneously interpreted a provision of law. See Metropolitan Dade Cty. v. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot., 714 So. 2d 512, 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Copcutt v. State, 477 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)