THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
ANTONIO RAMON RODRIGUEZ, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2004-02-18
No. 3D02-1292
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.
865 So. 2d 664 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a trial court cannot accept a plea to a lesser included offense without the consent of both the trial court and the prosecutor.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant was charged with cannabis trafficking but pleaded no contest to possession of marijuana with intent to deliver. The trial court accepted…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
LEVY, Judge.

LEVY, Judge.

The State of Florida appeals from a sentence imposed pursuant to a plea to a lesser included offense. We reverse.

On September 15, 2000, the State filed an Information against the Defendant, charging him with one count of cannabis trafficking. The Defendant entered a plea of no contest to the lesser included offense of possession of marijuana with intent to deliver. The trial court found the Defendant guilty, withheld adjudication, and imposed one year of community control followed by one year of probation. The Defendant was required to perform 300 hours of community service with the possibility of converting the last six months of community control to probation. This appeal follows.

The State contends that the trial court erred in accepting a plea to the lesser included offense without the consent of the prosecutor. We agree. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(h) states that a defendant “may plead guilty to any lesser offense than that charged that is included in the offense charged in the indictment or information or to any lesser degree of the offense charged” with the consent of the trial court and of the prosecutor. The Record does not indicate any agreement by the State to the reduced charge. Thus, the trial court improvidently accepted the plea to the lesser included offense absent consent from the State. Accordingly, this case is reversed and remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this Opinion.

Reversed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw