CLAIRE J. SIDRAN AND PHILLIP SIDRAN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND SIDRAN ORCHIDS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO SIDRAN ORCHIDS, A FLORIDA PARTNERSHIP, APPELLANTS,
v.
E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, OFE INTERNATIONAL INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND ASGROW FLORIDA COMPANY A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 2003-12-24
No. 3D02-2391
Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
866 So. 2d 80 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In light of our decision on the plenary appeal, Sidran v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., 866 So. 2d 79, 2003 WL 22799515 (Fla. 3d DCA, November 26, 2003), we reverse the trial court’s order granting the appellee’s motion for attorney’s fees.

Reversed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Child v. Child, 34 So. 3d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
    …avidson, 882 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). We agree, however, that this requirement may not stand absent evidence or findings as to the cost, amount, or the availability of such insurance. See Massam, 993 So. 2d at 1022; Rubinstein v. Rubinstein, 866 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Zimmerman v. Zimmerman, 755 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Schere v. Schere, 645 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Accordingly, we reverse this provision of the final judgment. Because the trial court, on remand, must reconsider the…
  • Sidran v. E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co., 866 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
    …PER CURIAM. Because of the reversal of the underlying judgment in Sidran v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., 866 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 3d November 26, 2003), the accompanying cost judgment now before us is also reversed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw