CLAUDIA SALOMON, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Valdivia v. Prestige Cruises, 898 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …ply, rather than a federal choice of law venue analysis). Further, the time limitation in rule 1.061(g) does not affect the trial court’s ability to raise the forum non conveniens issue sua sponte at any time. See Verysell-Holding LLC v. Tsukanov, 866 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 3rd DCA), rev. denied, 874 So. 2d 1194 (2004) (holding that the sixty-day time limit imposed by rule of civil procedure governing service of a party’s motion to dismiss based on forum non conveniens does not apply to a trial court’s inherent p…
• Gerri Lynn Fihe v. Rexall Sundown, Inc., 966 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
  …Fla. 3d DCA 2006). Rexall admitted at the hearing that its failure to act within sixty days in the Fihe case was not the result of excusable neglect. Rather, Rexall relies on the third district’s earlier decision in Verysell-Holding LLC v. Tsukanov, 866 So. 2d 114, 115 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). There, the defendant filed an untimely motion to dismiss, but contended that the trial court had the inherent power to dismiss the case sua sponte even after the expiration of the sixty days. The third district accepted this…

Authorities Cited

• Herise v. State, 763 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)