ANTHONY E. PARKS, APPELLANT,
v.
EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2004-02-11
No. 4D02-2734
POLEN, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
866 So. 2d 122 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the issues raised by appellant and find them to be without merit. We therefore affirm the main appeal. We reverse on the cross-appeal for a correction of a scrivener’s error as to prejudgment interest, which should have been $35,724.74. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

POLEN, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Justa Patricia Delgado v. Laundromax, Inc., 65 So. 3d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
    …t”); Vermeulen v. Worldwide Holidays, Inc., 922 So. 2d 271, 273 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (affirming summary judgment and finding that “the mere happening of an accident does not give rise to an inference of negligence.”); Williams v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 866 So. 2d 122, 124 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the defendant in a negligence case, after noting that “while the burden on a moving party seeking summary judgment is a heavy one, it is not impossible”). A summary judgment motion tr…
  • …PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from the trial court’s grant of final summary judgment in favor of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. We affirm. See Williams v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 866 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Affirmed. GROSS, C.J., WARNER and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw